Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Metamorfose

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 20:13, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

=[[A Metamorfose]]=

:{{la|A Metamorfose}} ([{{fullurl:A Metamorfose|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Metamorfose}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Article about a student film where in the only possible claim to notability is that it was screened at some notable foreign film festivals. Googling 'Metamorfose "Frederico Beja" -Wikipedia' (Beja is the director) yields [http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&hs=zcm&q=Metamorfose+%22Frederico+Beja%22+-Wikipedia&start=100&sa=N 60 unique hits]. (Note that Searching "A Metamorfose" is insufficient as it is the Portuguese title for the classic novel, The Metamorphosis. Verdatum (talk) 00:36, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:05, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

  • More than enough time for secondary sources to be added, if there are any. Delete. --fvw* 01:42, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete - The film does not satisfy any of the notability criteria for films. [http://news.google.com/archivesearch?oe=utf-8&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&um=1&ie=UTF-8&tab=wn&q=%22A+Metamorfose%22+%22Catholic+University+of+Portugal%22 Google News][http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22A+Metamorfose%22+%22Beja%22&btnG=Search&oe=utf-8&um=1&ie=UTF-8] does not reveal anything for the film's cause either. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 01:43, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete Insufficient notability. ChildofMidnight (talk) 01:49, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete: Fails WP:NF. Schuym1 (talk) 03:08, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete No evidence of notability Alberon (talk) 11:23, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Userfy and editor is counceled about verifiability by closing admin. The user has 0 edits. This is his very first effort on wikipedia. WP:BITE:
    Understand that newcomers are both needed by, and of value to, the community. By empowering newcomers, we improve the diversity of knowledge, opinions and ideals on Wikipedia, enhance its value and preserve its neutrality and integrity as a resource. In fact, it has been found that newcomers are responsible for adding the majority of lasting content to Wikipedia (i.e. substantive edits). While insiders and administrators are responsible for a large bulk of total edits, these often involve tweaking, reverting, and rearranging content.
    The overwhelming majority of the Articles for deletion are against new editor creators. Since October 2007 Wikipedia's article-base is slowing, and the Economist magazine attributes this to the way that veteran editors treat new wikipedians.[http://www.economist.com/printedition/displaystory.cfm?story_id=10789354] travb (talk) 17:59, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete. Non-notable. Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 00:32, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.