Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aakhri Nishchay

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_preload&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Aakhri Nishchay}}&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aakhri Nishchay}}&editintro=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_intro&preloadtitle={{urlencode:Aakhri Nishchay}}§ion=new&title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_undeletion&create=Request request the article's undeletion]. Barkeep49 (talk) 02:56, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

=[[:Aakhri Nishchay]]=

:{{la|Aakhri Nishchay}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Aakhri_Nishchay Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Aakhri Nishchay}})

A Bollywood film, sourced only to non-WP:RS IMDb. A WP:BEFORE turned up a [https://muvyz.com/moviepage/kb724133 plot summary], which the article lacks, but nothing at all of significance. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFILM. Narky Blert (talk) 20:35, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:42, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:42, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

Delete: Per nom. A search did not produce anything significant and Wikipedia is not an IMDb mirror. It is considered unreliable per WP:ELP, WP:RSPS, and WP:RS/IMDB. Wikipedia is also not a crystal ball so if there are sources "out there" then they need to be presented. Not opposed to recreation if significant coverage in independent and reliable sources are presented. -- Otr500 (talk) 14:34, 20 May 2020 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.