Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abdul Hibombo

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Guerillero | My Talk 01:28, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

=[[Abdul Hibombo]]=

:{{la|Abdul Hibombo}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Abdul Hibombo}})

Article fails to make clear what makes this journalist notable. A small row is not enough. Night of the Big Wind talk 14:56, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:22, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:23, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:23, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

  • keep - this "small row" seem to have had quite alot of attention.--BabbaQ (talk) 17:05, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 01:18, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 04:32, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

  • Changed my say from weak keep to keep.. just to signal that I still is in support of keeping the article. and after reviewing it again I find that a Keep is for the best.--BabbaQ (talk) 17:21, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
  • It looks like mr. Hibombo is that important that nobody is interested in him, except you and me! That is not a good sign for his notability! Night of the Big Wind talk 05:32, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
  • and you take that as an indicator of notability? geeesh.--BabbaQ (talk) 19:17, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
  • weak delete -- why is there no article in the Swedish language wikipedia? --Austrian (talk) 21:39, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
  • An article about a Swedish person who doesnt have an article on Swedish Wikipedia isnt per that fact unnutalbe and its not a reason to delete.--BabbaQ (talk) 19:17, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
  • Not a reason, true. It just casts doubt on his notability. Austrian (talk) 22:37, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
  • Delete and burn with fire. Seems he is notable for having minor immigration issues and having a barney with a theatre director! Does not meet the notability requirements per WP:NOTNEWS and WP:BLP1E Pol430 talk to me 21:55, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Bryce (talk | contribs) 02:59, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

  • Still consider this a article to keep. Its clear to me by reading it and the sources that the subject is clearly within WP:BIO.--BabbaQ (talk) 19:17, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
  • delete as per WP:BLP1E . The coverage does not indicate broader notability. LibStar (talk) 15:18, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.