Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abhinit Gupta

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 14:21, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

=[[:Abhinit Gupta]]=

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|Abhinit Gupta}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Abhinit_Gupta Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Abhinit Gupta}})

black hat seo spam sources, no meaningful coverage, fails everything. Praxidicae (talk) 13:27, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 13:51, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 13:51, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

  • Delete. Promotional and not for Wikipedia. Mccapra (talk) 16:32, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Delete an overly promotional article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:49, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Delete as per nom. - Hatchens (talk) 07:33, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Delete per all of the above Spiderone 11:50, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Although I'm undecided about this, I would say that three of the sources on the article (Patrika, News18, and Hotstar) are popular sources in our area. Aren't these enough to not delete the article and edit it for its promotional tone rather? Lightbluerain (talk) 18:08, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

::News18 is just PR spam, so no. Praxidicae (talk) 02:32, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

  • DeleteMostly local and trivial coverage. MistyGraceWhite (talk) 13:27, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
  • keep notable personalitymore reliable sources are in hindi also am working on its neutrality and notabilityEasytostable (talk) 01:51, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Delete Completely PROMO. --Goldsztajn (talk) 09:17, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

I think the article is not anymore promotional to its current version and clearly meeting wikipedia G.N.GEasytostable (talk) 21:39, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.