Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abner Cope

May not meet the notability criteria for artists. I dream of horses (T) @ 13:55, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

:{{la|Abner Cope}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Abner_Cope Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Abner Cope}})

• Not sure what the definition of "notable" is however he is notable enough that people are willing to pay for his workshops and pay for his artwork and pay for commissions and for there to be articles written about him in magazines such as International Artist. He has had a number of exhibits with a number of awards. And since I am just starting on the article, it seems kind of quick to mark the article for deletion within an hour of it's initial posting. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Richardelainechambers (talk • contribs) 15:24, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
• Definition easily found at WP:ARTIST. Regards, FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 17:05, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. I dream of horses (T) @ 13:56, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. I dream of horses (T) @ 13:56, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

• Keep I see lots of links, although nothing particularly significant. As User:richardelainechambers says, let's give it a chance to grow. Note: last edit was to fix the formatting of the AfD, which was somehow reversed. New Media Theorist (talk) 22:00, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
• That's not how AfD works. Either there is evidence for notability or there isn't. At present there is no evidence in independent and reliable sources that he passes WP:ARTIST, nor is there extensive coverage about him to satisfy WP:GNG, ergo this article need to be deleted per this AfD nomination. The draft can be userfied so that if he becomes notable the creator can work on it and move it anew. It can also be undeleted by requesting the deleting admin to do so if new coverage is available, but I don't think that's likely anytime soon. Cheers, FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 17:05, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

• I am not going to waste my time working on an article that is slated for deletion. This kind of thing is why I stopped with Wikipedia changes several years ago. Reminds me of the kid who built a clock and ended up being arrested for a hoax bomb. Richardelainechambers (talk) 16:43, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
• [Redacted WP:BLP violation by FoCuS]

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:08, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:08, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:08, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:08, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

• Delete. Fails WP:GNG and WP:ARTIST. I found no extensive coverage, only minor mentions in local websites about co-exhibitions. Best, FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 17:01, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
• Delete for now as although I found links at News, Books, browser and Highbeam , there's nothing to suggest better improvement. SwisterTwister talk 00:00, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
• Delete - some coverage, but not enough in-depth to show that they meet WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 03:26, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.