Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abolfazl Monadi

:{{la|Abolfazl Monadi}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Abolfazl_Monadi Stats])

:({{Find sources|Abolfazl Monadi}})

Insufficient secondary source coverage. TYelliot | Talk | Contribs 00:46, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

• Keep notable enough to pass WP:GNG. Bisswajit 08:05, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
• Delete. Does not appear to satisfy WP:PROF, and a brief blurb at OVGuide (with no identifiable source) is far from sufficient for WP:GNG. Hqb (talk) 08:40, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:06, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:06, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:06, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

• Delete. No evidence of passing any category of WP:Prof. Xxanthippe (talk) 21:39, 2 April 2014 (UTC).
• Delete per WP:NOTMEMORIAL. One online video interview with the subject is far from enough for WP:GNG and we have no evidence of passing any of the WP:PROF criteria. —David Eppstein (talk) 00:14, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
• Delete. No evidence of academic or overall notability. WP:NOTMEMORIAL.Truth or consequences-2 (talk) 20:08, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
• Delete. For reasons articulated above Kabirat (talk) 08:53, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.