Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Absal

:{{la|Absal}} ([{{fullurl:Absal|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Absal}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

I declined the speedy deletion nomination, so I'm bringing it here for further evaluation. I remain neutral. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 04:10, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

• Speedy Delete: I realize that you declined the CSD, but the sole paragraph in the article is a direct copyvio from the second paragraph of http://www.presstv.com/detail.aspx?id=54395§ionid=351020102 and as such fits the CSD G12 criteria. Frmatt (talk) 04:13, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
• Keep: After having seen the new page and looked at some of the references, I've changed my position to Keep as the original author has removed the CopyVio paragraph and it appears to be a notable company. Frmatt (talk) 04:04, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

• Strong Keep: I did all the necessary corrections. The company's name was misspelled by presstv. Thus the difficulty to find references through a google search (including the co.'s own website). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.116.251.98 (talk) 06:07, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

• Speedy Delete: not much about the company, hence why I nominated for db. If you want to keep it add more sources and notability, or else it will just be a stub class. ^TheWeak_Willed 11:16, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
• Keep Notable. Sourcing is adequate and article can be expanded. ChildofMidnight (talk) 19:17, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
• Keep. It's a major Iranian company and is important in the home appliance market of Iran. Alefbe (talk) 20:27, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- Theleftorium 21:12, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.