Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Accredited crowd funding

:{{la|Accredited crowd funding}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Accredited_crowd_funding Stats])

:({{Find sources|Accredited crowd funding}})

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Cliff Smith 19:25, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

Unsourced non-notable neologism that fails WP:NEO. William C. Skelley who allegedly coined the term doesn't seem to have an article either, so no target for a possible redirect. Add to that the fact that a certain William Carleton used the term [http://www.wac6.com/wac6/2012/05/accred.html in his blog] already in May 2012. I can't find any reliable sources that indicate how this term is routinely being used outside of a few law and/or financial blogs. De728631 (talk) 17:14, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

• Redirect to crowd funding. This article is kind of a mess, containing no sources and consisting primarily of a long definition of an accredited investor. What sourcing there is seems too closely tied to crowd funding in general to deserve its own article. Perhaps someone could add a section to the crowd funding article. Nwlaw63 (talk) 17:37, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

• Redirect — per Nwlaw63. — Fly by Night (talk) 21:18, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:29, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

• Delete due to copying issue regarding http://wiki.answers.com, and replace with redirect to crowd funding per the above. Monty₈₄₅ 19:50, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
• Delete and redirect to crowd funding per Monty845. — Mr. Stradivarius ^{(have a chat)} 11:53, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.