Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Acefi

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 16:53, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

=[[Acefi]]=

:{{la|Acefi}} ([{{fullurl:Acefi|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Acefi}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

I can't find any evidence that supports the assertion that this novel is "acclaimed". A Google search for {{Google|Acefi Pierrot}} results in about 180 pages: all press releases, forum posts, and bookshops.

I am including the article about the author A. Pierrot in this AfD, since the only claim to notability there is having written this book. ... discospinster _talk 20:01, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 12:06, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Acclaimed? Ich don't think so. Can't find anything of significance on it at all. Ditto for author. Drmies (talk) 14:28, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
Delete both. I am unable to substantiate any acclaim through reliable sources. -- Whpq (talk) 16:51, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.