Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aco Records

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. MBisanz ^talk 02:53, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

=[[Aco Records]]=

:{{la|Aco Records}} ([{{fullurl:Aco Records|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aco Records}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

I can't find any reliable sources that show notability. This is a record label that only re-released records. Fails WP:CORP. Schuym1 (talk) 23:45, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

Delete - per nom.--User:Truco User talk:Truco Special:Contributions/Truco 23:57, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
Keep. 1920s record labels is a subject of interest long covered by various publications. Notable in bringing lots of US pop recordings to the UK & Commonwealth markets. As Aco records are not uncommon to find in stacks of old records from this era, good to have a bit of info about the label. -- Infrogmation (talk) 00:56, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
The article needs multiple reliable sources with significant coverage. Schuym1 (talk) 01:26, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 23:52, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
Then it should be tagged for cleanup, and not brought to AFD. Lugnuts (talk) 10:22, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:03, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

Delete: insufficient independent 3rd party coverage WP:CORP. JamesBurns (talk) 07:20, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 02:11, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

Merge/Redirect to Aeolian Records/Vocalion Records. Esradekan Gibb ^"Talk" 05:58, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
Keep It's not surprising Schuym1 can't find references. This label is pre-internet era and sources are not likely to be online. I've asked Infrogmation to share his sources and I encourage everyone to do the same in similar situations. Only after the original author fails to share their sources should deletion become an option. - Mgm|^(talk) 10:18, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.