Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Acsis Incorporated
=[[Acsis Incorporated]]=
:{{la|Acsis Incorporated}} – (
:({{Find sources|Acsis Incorporated}})
Article reads much like the press releases listed as citations. There is no independent citations to prove WP:NOTE. Suggest editor look at [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Article_wizard2.0 Article Wizard] and follow those steps. As it stands this article does not meet eligibility requirements. With some work it might have enough merit. Golgofrinchian (talk) 19:36, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
I've removed all biased speak and call to action language. There is little online about our company as of right now but this article will be edited later when I can add more sources and case studies. thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Coreymeyers (talk • contribs) 14:55, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:33, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:34, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Yet another solutions provider of products and services for product visibility and traceability and supply chain optimization. Is there a back office tech startup that doesn't imagine itself an encyclopedia subject? - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 15:01, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
After looking at the thousands of Wikipedia articles on this site, it is apparent that Acsis Inc's entry offers proper information and relevance that many on this site simply do not have. With upcoming serialization mandates rapidly becoming the norm, Acsis solidifies itself as the leading company helping organizations make this transition seamlessly. We understand the saturation of supply-chain software companies on wikipedia, however we feel as if we stand out from the herd in more ways than one. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Coreymeyers (talk • contribs) 15:21, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete as spam. Note that I've removed material from the article that was copied verbatim from web pages as copyright violations. -- Whpq (talk) 16:18, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.