Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AdNews

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 14:51, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

=[[AdNews]]=

:{{la|AdNews}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/AdNews Stats])

:({{Find sources|AdNews}})

Declined Prod. Prod Reason was "Unreferenced article that does not meet WP:GNG nor meets the specific notability guideline of WP:NCORP". Author of article declined the prod on the grounds of improvement by adding a link to the Alexa ranking. Per WP:ALEXA Alexa rankings do not confer encyclopedic notability. We come back to WP:GNG and WP:NCORP as the significant problems in this article. Hasteur (talk) 13:54, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:11, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:11, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:12, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:12, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

Delete per nom. It's unlikely that a specialised trade magazine like this is notable. Nick-D (talk) 03:43, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 14:28, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

Delete No indications that this local trade journal has any widespread notability. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 15:59, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Comment Adnews is heavily interwoven through [http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=281H7JjhOo4C&lpg=PA282&ots=wcXiHmoX0H&dq=%22AdNews%22&pg=PA282#v=onepage&q=%22AdNews%22&f=false this history] of advertising in Australian, both under its current name and the name under which it was founded in 1928, "Advertising News". A Highbeam search also turns up many articles in "Australasian Business Intelligence" about its annual awards etc. AllyD (talk) 18:34, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
delete it turns up hits but insufficient in-depth coverage to meet WP:GNG. LibStar (talk) 09:23, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.