Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Adamski

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. While Kotniski does make a point, there is a clear lack of sources to prove notability. The consensus therefore that I see is for delete. Wifione _.......^{Leave a message} 06:45, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

=[[Adam Adamski]]=

:{{la|Adam Adamski}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Adamski}}|2=AfD statistics}})

:({{Find sources|Adam Adamski}})

Non-notable bodybuilder who has not won any major championships in his sport. The article lacks references and contains at least one dubious BLP reference. Fails WP:ATHLETE and WP:RS. Regent of the Seatopians (talk) 01:58, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

Delete, not sourceable to the level required by WP:NOTE . Peter Karlsen (talk) 02:09, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
Delete fails WP:ATHLETE. LibStar (talk) 02:35, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
Delete - I couldn't find anything nor is the anything currently in the article to establish notablity. ~~ GB fan ~~ 03:17, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. -- Jujutacular ^talk 14:49, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. -- Jujutacular ^talk 14:49, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. -- Jujutacular ^talk 14:50, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
Keep. :Huh? The guy's a national champion and sixth in the world (so it says). If that isn't notable, I don't know what is. (Plenty of hits on Polish bodybuilding sites - the Polish version of the article contains some independent sources.)--Kotniski (talk) 21:14, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
Delete Although having competed at 2008 World Amateur Championships - I think he does scrape by WP:ATHLETE - but he fails WP:GNG. There doesn't appear to be any significant coverage of him and/or his work. Panyd^{The muffin is not subtle} 12:00, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

::I still don't see people's thinking here. Having competed in his sport's major world championship, he doesn't just "scrape by" WP:ATHLETE, he passes it confortably. (I don't know why being national champion isn't listed as a criterion under athlete, but it surely should be, and that would be another reason.) American athletes of far less significance are given Wikipedia articles - why the rush to delete someone who just happens to come from a country where the sources are written in a funny language?--Kotniski (talk) 12:19, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.