Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Bold

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 17:09, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

=[[Adam Bold]]=

:{{la|Adam Bold}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Adam_Bold Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Adam Bold}})

WP:BIO, WP:RESUME: Article reads like a resume, and the articles about two enterprises he's supposedly well known for ~~are well on their way for deletion~~ have been deleted. Sufficient independent, reliable coverage of the individual does not exist to sustain this Wikipedia article. Brianhe (talk) 16:52, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

Delete Wikipedia is not a free resume hosting service. Not finding anything particularly notable about this individual.--Paul McDonald (talk) 17:37, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:27, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:27, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:27, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:27, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:27, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

Delete - Subject who wants to be promoted. No reliable references to establish this subject as notable. Reads like resume. CookieMonster755 (talk) 06:45, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
Delete this resume. Most of the sources, i.e. MutualFundShow.com, are not third-party, in my opinion. — Wylie pedia 03:51, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
Delete Too heavily sourced to websites that he is extremely linked to.John Pack Lambert (talk) 11:18, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.