Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Hughes (poet)

:{{la|Adam Hughes (poet)}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Adam_Hughes_(poet) Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Adam Hughes (poet)}})

fails wp:author Avono♂ (talk) 20:40, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

one review, book listings and one nomination therefore does not meet significant coverage:fails all criteria of wp:author Avono♂ (talk) 21:34, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 20:46, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 20:46, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

• Speedy keep. Nomination articulates no policy- or guideline-based reasons for deletion. Nominator has been slapping this article with deletion tags (some clearly incorrect) since a new editor began writing it, without affording them any reasonable chance to complete their work. There's no indication the nominator has complied with WP:BEFORE, which is more difficult in this case because other notable/significant people share this common name -- but that's no justification for hasty deletion, especially for an article created barely 48 hours ago. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 21:06, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

::note: a seconded prod was contested by User:Hullaballoo Wolfowitz Avono♂ (talk) 21:34, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:54, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

• I'm undecided on this one, it seems to me like a borderline notability case. Weak keep or weak delete (in this order). --Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 22:57, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

::Struck !vote above of blocked sock puppet, per WP:SOCKHELP. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:26, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

• Comment The citations only consisted of web links so it was hard to tell much about them. I have updated them all to have at least titles and publishers. That said, the sources consist of online poetry sites that are essentially blogs (as far as I can tell) and the site of the publisher of the two books. Admittedly, it is very hard to be notable as a poet. The NYQ press seems to be a reputable publisher of poetry. I'm leaning toward a weak keep. LaMona (talk) 19:44, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

---

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e decker^talk 20:23, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

---

---

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rcsprinter₁₂₃ (drawl) @ 15:50, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

---

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.