Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Internet

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Jerry delusional ¤ kangaroo 21:03, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

=[[Adam Internet]]=

:{{la|Adam Internet}} ([{{fullurl:Adam Internet|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Internet}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

The article has 3 reliable sources but the article fails to state notability. Bidgee (talk) 00:27, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —Bidgee (talk) 00:29, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

:*Keep because the article claims the company has 100+ staff and 75,000+ customers; I think this constitutes an assertion of notability.--S Marshall ^Talk/_Cont 01:14, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

::*Article claims of the number of staff and customers it has doesn't make it notable. Bidgee (talk) 02:24, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

:::*I don't get the objection to this article at all, then. Coverage in reliable sources is what makes something notable, and you agree in your nomination that Adam Internet has reliable sources. So what's the problem?--S Marshall ^Talk/_Cont 03:34, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

:*Keep but more work is needed--Ret.Prof (talk) 01:07, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

Keep but needs work. We66er (talk) 01:51, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.