Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Radly

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 02:03, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

=[[Adam Radly]]=

:{{la|Adam Radly}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Adam_Radly Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Adam Radly}})

promotional bio for unimportant computer executive . Referring to a non-entertainmemt personality by his first name alone is almost always a sign of either a vanity autobio or writing by a press agent who does not realize WP is an encyclopedia DGG ( talk ) 09:06, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E 09:42, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E 09:42, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E 09:42, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 00:42, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

  • Delete Does not pass notability guidelines for business people.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:13, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

{{resize|96%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Deadbeef 01:47, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

  • Delete Fails notability criteria. All the coverage at the article, and all I could find in a search, is self-referential or self-supplied information (such as press releases). --MelanieN (talk) 02:01, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.