Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Robert Smith
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Stifle (talk) 11:33, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
=[[Adam Robert Smith]]=
:{{la|Adam Robert Smith}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|Adam Robert Smith}})
Non-notable individual Khendon (talk) 08:03, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
- Delete He owns a small web design business and has been written up by a few local newspapers. This is run of the mill coverage that does not make him notable. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 08:39, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:51, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:51, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Lacks reliable independent secondary sources sufficient to establish notability per WP:GNG and fails to state a reason why the founder of yet another website developer service should be considered notable in lieu of sources. I agree with Cullen328 that the sources offered constitute little more than local human interest and local business coverage. Googling turned up nothing. I also checked both Highbeam and newspapers.com for coverage of either the subject or his company and found nothing. Msnicki (talk) 19:52, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
- delete per Cullen. Nowhere near notable as a business person. Andy Dingley (talk) 20:18, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.