Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AdeS

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:42, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

=[[AdeS]]=

:{{la|AdeS}} ([{{fullurl:AdeS|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AdeS}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

The article does not indicate in what way this product is notable, it is a minimal 2-line stub. The single reference given is to an article which briefly mentions the brand as being acquired by Coca Cola some years ago. It was prod'ed, but the prod removed with a reference to a google search which mentions the product some archived Google news articles. I did not check all of them, but the first one is again a trivial mention which merely lists this brand among many other brands in Indonesia. LoverOfTheRussianQueen (talk) 22:54, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 00:52, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
Weak keep I understand the nomination argument, but a $20 million subsidiary of Coca Cola is something the world may wish to know about. Chutznik (talk) 22:14, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
Coke is a $30 Billion dollar company. $20M is drop in a bucket (excuse the pun) in that context. LoverOfTheRussianQueen (talk) 14:46, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 12 July 2009 (UTC){{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AdeS||}}

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BJ^Talk 19:39, 18 July 2009 (UTC){{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AdeS||}}

:Keep. Accurate stub article about a business, with cited news coverage. Expansion potential. Acquisition by major corp indicates significance in national market. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 19:58, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

:Keep Big and significant company. I added a few external links there. --Vejvančický (talk) 20:01, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.