Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adesua Dozie

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|Adesua Dozie}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Adesua Dozie}})

Although as at the time this article is being nominated for deletion there are no sources present in the article, a before search did show [https://www.thisdaylive.com/index.php/2020/02/09/adesua-dozie-joins-mobil-producing-as-executive-director-general-counsel/amp/ this], which appears to be written by a guest editor, [https://businessday.ng/life-arts/article/women-in-business-adesua-dozie-and-bekeme-masade-olowola/amp/ this] which appears to be a promotional sponsored post & [https://bizwatchnigeria.ng/adesua-dozie-joins-mobil-as-executive-director-general-counsel/ this] which appears to be a mere announcement. In all, I do not see WP:GNG satisfied as subject lacks in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent of them. Celestina007 (talk) 19:40, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 19:40, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 19:40, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 19:40, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 19:40, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 19:40, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 19:40, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

This article has been significantly improved with the addition of credible independent sources. this is in addition to the several in line link that has now been added to the article. The article therefore meets Wikipedia's policy of verifiability and Notability. I therefore vote for keep. Omorodion1 (talk) 21:03, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

::*Comment — The editor above @{{u|Omorodion1}}, is the article creator.

:::I have analyzed most of the sources used in the article already in my opening AFD rationale, your two new inclusions appear to be [https://www.vanguardngr.com/2016/04/ge-reports-nigerias-adesua-dozie-shares-her-career-advice-for-women/ this](which is an interview thus isn't independent of her) & [https://leadingladiesafrica.org/adesua-dozie-teni-apata-kadaria-ahmed-ngozi-nkwoji-these-are-nigerias-100-most-inspiring-women-in-2019-2/ this] which is a list article with very short biographies affixed to each entry, this doesn’t adhere to WP:SIGCOV & of no value to WP:GNG which requires significant coverage. How else might I explain to you that this subject isn’t notable just yet? If you want me to create a table I honestly would. Celestina007 (talk) 20:35, 13 November 2020 (UTC)

• Delete - I've reviewed the available sources and the reasoning provided by Celestina007, and I agree that the article fails WP:NBIO. Edge3 (talk) 06:00, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

• Delete: Lack of significant coverage in multiple reliable sources.Ruqayya ansari (talk) 13:04, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.