Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aditya Ram
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
=[[:Aditya Ram]]=
{{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adityaram}}
:{{la|1=Aditya Ram}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|title=Aditya Ram}})
Fails WP:SIGCOV. References are PR, clickbait , profiles and passing mentions. Fails WP:BIO. scope_creepTalk 20:06, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy delete G4. Mccapra (talk) 20:39, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and India. Shellwood (talk) 21:15, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Andhra Pradesh-related deletion discussions. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 20:26, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
- Comment This was previously deleted by AfD in 2013, but I don't think G4 applies here. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 20:26, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
- :checked some one tried to create multiple time to name change. now article updated check and remove AfD tag .. Aditya Ram to Adityaram name changed few years before name space not mistake Lyla Albert (talk) 10:04, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
:https://celpox.com/celebs/aditya-ram-producer?ID=50264
:https://www.cinestaan.com/people/aditya-ram-110890
:https://www.moviebuff.com/aditya-ram
:https://clapnumber.com/celebrity/adityaram
:https://www.cinejosh.com/news/2/2566/aditya-ram-in-trouble-with-puri-jagannath.html
:https://www.indiaglitz.com/aditya-ram-appeals-for-ending-piracy-telugu-news-51315
:https://www.filmytoday.com/image/view/1023435/film-producer-and-studio-owner-mr-adityaram-received-the-best-realty-brand-award-2015/ Eva Allison (talk) 06:54, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
- Comment More profiles and clickbait and a non-notable award from a construction company/real estate company. More PR. scope_creepTalk 08:58, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
- :he is doing real estate business and film producing ..he got five more awards Lyla Albert (talk) 10:07, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
- Comment This article was rejected three times at Afc. scope_creepTalk 12:26, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
- :yes accept but now improved content and reference URLs Lyla Albert (talk) 08:44, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
:original name is Aditya Ram other name was Adityaram Lyla Albert (talk) 10:08, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
- Comment What you have done is pile the article with reams on really poor references that hits WP:CITEKILL, that are clickbait, PR, profiles, even listing, SPS sources and other junk references. scope_creepTalk 16:27, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Lets look at the first 15 references:
- Ref 1 [https://www.newindianexpress.com/entertainment/tamil/2008/dec/15/puri-jagannath-teams-up-with-adityaram-10734.html Puri Jagannath teams up with Adityaram] Mentioned in headline. Rest is a passing mention. Signficant:No, Independent:Yes, In-depth:No
- Ref 2 [https://nettv4u.com/celebrity/tamil/producer/adityaram Adityaram] A site similar to IMDB Signficant:No, Independent:Yes, In-depth:No
- Ref 3 [https://www.imdb.com/user/ur50389829/?ref_=_usr IMDB] Non-RS.
- Ref 4 [https://telugu.samayam.com/telugu-movies/cinema-news/tollywood-producer-adityaram-mother-passes-away/articleshow/66577908.cms Maternal divorce to producer Adityaram] Signficant:Yes, Independent:No, In-depth:No
- Ref 5 [http://www.idlebrain.com/news/functions/purijagan-adityaram.html Puri Jagan - Aditya Ram join hands together] "15 years of Aditya Ram Group of Industries – Aditya Ram" A small paragraph. Signficant:No, Independent:No, In-depth:No
- Ref 6 [https://www.filmibeat.com/celebs/aditya-ram.html Filibeat] Non-RS.
- Ref 7 [https://digall.in/adityaram-group-owner-biography-wiki-ethnicity-wife-parents/] Account suspended.
- Ref 8 [https://www.rightrasta.com/adityaram-group-owner-biography/ Profile site] Primary. Signficant:No, Independent:No, In-depth:No
- Ref 9 [https://www.adityaram.in/about-adityaram/ About] SPS site. Signficant:No, Independent:No, In-depth:No
- Ref 10 [https://in.bookmyshow.com/person/aditya-ram/in.bookmyshow.com/person/aditya-ram/IEIN013958 Page not found]. Dead link.
- Ref 11 [http://mytelugulyrics.com/producer/250 Profile site]. Signficant:No, Independent:No, In-depth:No
- Ref 12 [https://newtamilcinema.in/film-producer-and-studio-owner-mr-adityaram-received-the-best-realty-brand-award-2015/ Film Producer and Studio Owner Mr. Adityaram received the Best Realty Brand Award – 2015] Non-notable industry award. Signficant:No, Independent:No, In-depth:No
- Ref 13 [http://www.khojle.in/property-chennai-adityaram-film-producer-218474 Adityaram Film Producer] Clickbait site. Signficant:No, Independent:No, In-depth:No
- Ref 14 [https://www.filmiclub.com/person/aditya-ram-pejbd0r Aditya Ram (Producer)] Clickbait site. Signficant:No, Independent:No, In-depth:No
- Ref 15 [https://www.cinejosh.com/news/1/2566/aditya-ram-in-trouble-with-puri-jagannath.html Aditya Ram in trouble with Puri Jagannath] Two short paragraphs. . Signficant:No, Independent:No, In-depth:No
Not a single secondary sources amongst the lot of them. scope_creepTalk 10:13, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
:
{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Relisting comment: I'd like to see at least one other uninvolved editor, besides the nominator, look over the sources supplied.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 21:15, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
::will check and update 113.193.184.10 (talk) 04:16, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
::removed Non-RS urls and updated correct RS check and remove tag Lyla Albert (talk) 05:28, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
::anything else guide will update Lyla Albert (talk) 05:28, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
:https://in.bookmyshow.com/person/aditya-ram/IEIN013958/filmography Lyla Albert (talk) 05:29, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete too many violations (AfC bypass, PR links, non-reliable sources). --Bigneeerman (talk) 19:31, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. I don't see any reliable sources here and fails WP:GNG. In addition from the way it is sourced and filled with images, I strongly suspect the author of the article has a connection to the subject. Finally it is filled with typos and is not suitable as an encyclopedia entry in the state it's in. PaulPachad (talk) 01:22, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.