Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adrienne Outlaw

=[[Adrienne Outlaw]]=

:{{la|Adrienne Outlaw}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Adrienne_Outlaw Stats])

:({{Find sources|Adrienne Outlaw}})

Not a notable person. Tyros1972 Talk 09:44, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Tennessee-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:47, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:47, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:47, 15 June 2013 (UTC)


:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 20:09, 21 June 2013 (UTC)



:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LFaraone 00:45, 29 June 2013 (UTC)


  • Keep. Easily meets Wikipedia:ARTIST with "4.The person's work (or works) either (a) has become a significant monument, (b) has been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, (c) has won significant critical attention, or (d) is represented within the permanent collections of several notable galleries or museums." The article does need work but not deletion.--Canoe1967 (talk) 15:48, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
  • Weak delete More references may help.--Benfold (talk) 06:19, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
  • Keep - Artist's work has received coverage sufficient to establish notability. Aside from what has already been mentioned, a Google news search shows a lot of local coverage, but beyond that I also see articles behind pay walls in the Chicago Tribune and I found this [http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=dmBGAAAAIBAJ&sjid=_-cMAAAAIBAJ&pg=2556,1112258&dq=adrienne-outlaw&hl=en item] in the Daily Gazette of Schenectady NY. -- Whpq (talk) 17:24, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.