Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adventures in Voice Acting

:{{la|Adventures in Voice Acting}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Adventures in Voice Acting}})

PROD for non-notability was removed, so I'm bringing it here. A claim is made that a Google search proves notability--I don't see it that way, but then, I don't consider [http://www.activeanime.com/html/content/view/4732/36/ this sort of thing] a reliable source. Drmies (talk) 01:47, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

• Delete – I found one decent reference for the subject [http://www.newsarama.com/tv/080812-AniShortsVoiceActing.html], but that's not enough to keep the article. --Odie5533 (talk) 02:28, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. --Calathan (talk) 02:35, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

• Keep - A Google search for adventures in voice acting review turned up multiple reviews in reliable sources [http://www.animenewsnetwork.com/review/adventures-in-voice-acting] [http://www.themanime.org/viewreview.php?id=1150] [http://dvd.ign.com/articles/912/912976p1.html] [http://anime.about.com/od/voiceacting/fr/aiva_v1.htm]. All of those reviews are by sources that have been discussed and determined to be reliable (see Wikipedia:WikiProject Anime and manga/Online reliable sources). I only looked at the first page of hits in that Google search, so there may be more reviews out there. Calathan (talk) 02:35, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
• Keep I added in two links to sites that gave ample coverage. http://www.newsarama.com/tv/080812-AniShortsVoiceActing.html and http://www.animenewsnetwork.com/interview/2009-02-22/interview-tony-oliver-on-adventures-in-voice-acting are both reliable sources. Hordes of others as well, but you only need two, so that's all I bothered with. Dream Focus 03:45, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 03:59, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

• Keep A quick internet search shows references that could be used but i cannot be bothered to add them as i am tired, put a cleanup notice on the page instead. King Curtis Gooden (talk) 05:38, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
• Keep per sources found and offered. Tag for cleanup. We usually prefer to not delete what can be fixed through regular editing. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 06:55, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
• MQS, you know that you don't have to tell me what's in your final sentence (and I'll get on it). I'll take your word for your first. Nomination withdrawn; can someone close this? Drmies (talk) 14:37, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.