Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Advisory Neighborhood Commission Members, Washington, DC 2003–2004

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Lankiveil (speak to me) 10:02, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

=[[Advisory Neighborhood Commission Members, Washington, DC 2003–2004]]=

:{{la|Advisory Neighborhood Commission Members, Washington, DC 2003–2004}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Advisory_Neighborhood_Commission_Members,_Washington,_DC_2003%E2%80%932004 Stats])

:({{Find sources|Advisory Neighborhood Commission Members, Washington, DC 2003–2004}})

I am nominating this list for deletion because it consists almost completely of non-notable local politicians. As a consequence, it fails WP:LISTPEOPLE and WP:INDISCRIMINATE. I am also nominating the following related list in this nomination as well:

:{{la|Advisory Neighborhood Commission Members, Washington, DC 2005–2006}}

:{{la|Advisory Neighborhood Commission Members, Washington, DC 2007-2008}} IronGargoyle (talk) 21:37, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington, D.C.-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:00, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:00, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:00, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

  • Delete per nom. I think there's one genuinely notable name on all of these lists, and of course that person is notable because of other reasons. Way too low level for the individuals to receive any real attention, or for these lists to be anything more than an informational dead end and mere phone book-level data. postdlf (talk) 22:24, 27 February 2014 (UTC)


:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 03:04, 3 March 2014 (UTC)


  • Delete as pointless list-cruft. A list of non-notable people, which will forever be out of date. -- RoySmith (talk) 02:21, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.