Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aeneas Internet and Telephone

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:26, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

=[[:Aeneas Internet and Telephone]]=

:{{la|Aeneas Internet and Telephone}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Aeneas_Internet_and_Telephone Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Aeneas Internet and Telephone}})

Non-notable -BigDwiki^talk 00:17, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. -BigDwiki^talk 00:17, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:18, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Tennessee-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:18, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

Keep I was actually leaning towards delete based on the low GNews hits, all of which were incidental drive-by mentions in local press, but the GBooks hits shows that the company's recovery after the 2003 tornado was actually a very notable instance in the field of business continuity planning (See: [https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=6wwAAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA70&dq=%22Aeneas+Internet+and+Telephone%22&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjUyvDmnsblAhWEsHEKHU1mACwQ6AEIKTAA#v=onepage&q=%22Aeneas%20Internet%20and%20Telephone%22&f=false 1] [https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=UbwiAwAAQBAJ&pg=PA373&dq=%22Aeneas+Internet+and+Telephone%22&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjUyvDmnsblAhWEsHEKHU1mACwQ6AEIRTAE#v=onepage&q=%22Aeneas%20Internet%20and%20Telephone%22&f=false 2] [https://wnws.com/obituary-for-jonathan-harlan-ceo-aeneas-internet-telephone/ 3] [https://eu.jacksonsun.com/story/news/local/2018/11/14/aeneas-harlan-remembered-business-abilities-downtown-loyalty/1998323002/ 4] [https://www.csoonline.com/article/2116533/business-recovery-after-a-tornado--picking-up-the-pieces.html 5] [https://www.computerworld.com/article/2572594/twisters--hurricanes--floods--oh-my-.html 6]). The Computer World article clears it over any WP:AUD concerns, this is not a BLP article so WP:1E doesn't apply, as such my conclusion is keep per WP:GNG. FOARP (talk) 10:24, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:35, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Keep case studies are evidence of WP:GNG. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 16:15, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
Keep per FOARP.4meter4 (talk) 17:29, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.