Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aerocar 2000

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep Withdrawn by nominator. Non-admin closure. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 17:49, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

=[[Aerocar 2000]]=

:{{la|Aerocar 2000}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Aerocar_2000 Stats])

:({{Find sources|Aerocar 2000}})

No third-party coverage, therefore fails WP:GNG. Best I can tell it's an inventor's CAD drawings and a picture of a Lotus parked next to a flying car. Lacking third-party coverage, it fails to even rate being listed at Flying car (aircraft)#Concepts per the prior RFC discussion there. — Brianhe (talk) 00:25, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

Withdrawn by nominator — obviously there are sufficient sources. Brianhe (talk) 06:27, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:05, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:05, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

:Comment: Mentioned in Popular Mechanics here: [http://www.popularmechanics.com/cars/news/vintage-speed/4308953] Rmhermen (talk) 01:53, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

  • Keep - I was quickly able to turn up many third-party sources. Four have been added to the article, and more (gBooks snippet views of periodicals are annoyingly imprecise, only giving volume, not issue, numbers) [https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Aerocar+2000%22+%22Ed+Sweeney%22&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a#q=%22Aerocar%22+%22Ed+Sweeney%22&client=firefox-a&hs=ySD&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&source=lnms&tbm=bks&sa=X&ei=eZZ4UbOpMNLj4APSroGIDg&ved=0CAwQ_AUoAg&bav=on.2,or.r_qf.&bvm=bv.45645796,d.dmg&fp=a3cab9768feba17e&biw=1440&bih=770 here]. There is far and away enough coverage here for the WP:GNG to be fully satisfied. - The Bushranger One ping only 02:49, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.