Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aftermaster

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:46, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

=[[Aftermaster]]=

:{{la|Aftermaster}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aftermaster}}|2=AfD statistics}})

:({{Find sources|Aftermaster}})

Contested ProD, unremarkable audio mastering product, borderline advertising, trivial references, notability is not inherited 2 says you, says two 22:09, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

Delete - No coverage in reliable sources. The sourcing in the article is to press releases. And in my own search, I could only find more press releases. -- Whpq (talk) 16:40, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:58, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:59, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:14, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

Delete fails WP:GNG, I can't find anything independent of the subject, business as well.--NortyNort (Holla) 02:28, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.