Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Agent (video game)

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Rockstar North. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:04, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

=[[Agent (video game)]]=

AfDs for this article:

{{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Articles for deletion/Agent (video game)}}

:{{la|Agent (video game)}} ([{{fullurl:Articles for deletion/Agent (video game)|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Agent (video game)}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

fails Wikipedia:CRYSTAL as the game was just announced with almost zero info on it.陣内 _Jinnai 01:48, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 02:44, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. Greg Tyler ^{(t • c)} 11:33, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
Merge with Rockstar North. While it doesn't have much info available now, its foreseeably going to be able to have article at some point. Deletion is really too far, start a merge discussion or boldly redirect it yourself next time. And Crystal only applies to unverifiable speculation, everything in this article is cited. -- Sabre (talk) 16:21, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
Merge into Rockstar North per WP:PRODUCT. The subject may not satisfy the inclusion criteria for standalone articles, but I don't believe it falls under WP:CRYSTAL.

:http://e3.gamespot.com/story/6211142/rockstar-details-agent

:http://e3.gamespot.com/story/6211640/take-two-grooming-agent-to-be-the-next-gta

:http://ps3.ign.com/articles/989/989528p1.html — Rankiri (talk) 16:36, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

Merge per above. Not independently notable. Haipa Doragon (talk • contributions) 17:51, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
Keep Sources seem fine and meets WP:N and WP:CRYSTAL. Merge as a second choice, but I don't see a problem with leaving it as a stub. Hobit (talk) 21:18, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.