Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Agent Smith

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. I'm closing as Speedy Keep per SK1 as 1. Nominator hasn't searched for anything and 2. AFD isn't a clean up solution! (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 00:13, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

=[[Agent Smith]]=

:{{la|Agent Smith}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Agent_Smith Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Agent Smith}})

This article fails WP:NOTPLOT. DJ Autagirl (talk) 21:15, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2015 September 7. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 21:32, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
Comment: A robust, good-faith nomination might have mentioned the possibility of a merge and redirest to List of minor characters in the Matrix series and that this was one of a series of related nominations. Stuartyeates (talk) 21:41, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
Keep - Agent Smith has had an enduring impact. Weaving reprised the role two years ago, and The Guardian published an article about 'why I want to be Hugo Weaving in the Matrix' last year. --110.20.234.69 (talk) 08:26, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:36, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:36, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Keep there is lots of content in google about this topic. Stuartyeates (talk) 04:47, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. –Davey2010^Talk 00:13, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.