Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ahmad Glover

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 23:21, 27 August 2011 (UTC)

=[[Ahmad Glover]]=

:{{la|Ahmad Glover}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Ahmad Glover}})

  • Delete. This person at first seems a notable subject. I even started to clean up the article. However, it became evident that there are no significant independent sources to confirm notability. The article appears written by the subject (own name at bottom of article) and the citations are all published in minor or vanity press. Even his book is self-published. Overall, fails notability for WP:ACADEMIC. WWGB (talk) 09:50, 20 August 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —WWGB (talk) 09:53, 20 August 2011 (UTC)

  • Delete. Almost nothing on GS. Far too early. Xxanthippe (talk) 09:56, 20 August 2011 (UTC).

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 19:45, 20 August 2011 (UTC)

  • Delete - Nothing on Bing and Yahoo, and I wouldn't call this [http://presidentobama.connectplatform.com/cgi-bin/show_member.cgi?registry_id=888148 mention notable].SwisterTwister talk 21:12, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
  • Delete. No evidence of passing WP:PROF, and the sources given are completely inadequate to support the text of the article. —David Eppstein (talk) 23:06, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.