Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ahmed Fahour

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Per WP:SNOW and WP:NTEMP - nomination rationale is invalid as nobody can 'lose notability'. (non-admin closure) — neuro(talk) 04:15, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

=[[Ahmed Fahour]]=

:{{la|Ahmed Fahour}} ([{{fullurl:Ahmed Fahour|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ahmed Fahour}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

With recent restructure at NAB, Ahmed Fahour has lost notability. (see reference in National Australia Bank) Wizzzzman (talk) 20:51, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

:*This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 15:53, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

  • Keep per WP:NOTE "Notability is not temporary". Raitchison (talk) 16:22, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Keep per Raitchison. He was, at one time, notable. Templarion (talk) 17:25, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Keep - Notability is not temporary.  LinguistAtLarge • Msg  17:37, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
  • KeepOther users said it all. Notable people do not lose their relevance overnight. Andy (talk) 19:25, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Keep The article needs an update, but the others said it all. Notability isn't lost. Or do you plan on deleting George W. Bush when Obama is inaugurated? - Mgm|(talk) 01:11, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.