Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aidan McGrath

=[[Aidan McGrath]]=

:{{la|Aidan McGrath}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Aidan McGrath}})

No notability for this person outside a few local news sites, with nothing significant but local interest pieces LookAliveSunshine! (talk) 23:36, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

  • Keep His notability, if not particularly strong, is/was clearly national so far as Ireland is concerned, even if most (not all) of the sources are local. PWilkinson (talk) 09:47, 21 April 2011 (UTC)


:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

  • Comment - the AfD notice had been removed from the article, I reinstated it.--70.80.234.163 (talk) 03:29, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
  • Delete - there is some independent coverage but I don't think it's significant enough to warrant his own article. It's local, not particularly in depth, and the achievements are pretty run-of-the-mill (two non-notable award nominations and presidency of a barely notable organization from which notability is not inherited).--70.80.234.163 (talk) 03:29, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
  • Delete - A personal celebration, seemingly. Does not seem inclusion-worthy as either a politician or an activist. Carrite (talk) 14:25, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
  • Delete — Insufficient claims to notability. Appears to be a tribute page for local activist. Rms125a@hotmail.com (talk) 15:51, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
  • Delete Seems a local activist with no inherent notability. At the risk of a pun, WP:NOTINHERITED applies to this article. --Whiteguru (talk) 09:16, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:34, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

  • Keep Ireland as a small country relies heavily on local news coverage due to their high emphasis on local communities. The activist was a former national figure with strong public interest in his presidency. It is not usual for people of the activist's age to get such media coverage - local or national, which is why this article should be retained.

:: Note: I moved the above "keep" comment to its proper place. He/she jumped the queue. Rms125a@hotmail.com (talk) 19:31, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.