Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aimee Elizabeth

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. As no reliable, independent sources covering Elizabeth specifically and significantly have been presented, the arguments for retention are not backed by policy. Therefore, the article's subject is found to lack notability at this time. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 04:16, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

=[[Aimee Elizabeth]]=

:{{la|Aimee Elizabeth}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Aimee_Elizabeth Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Aimee Elizabeth}})

Does not meet GNG, NAUTHOR or REALITYTV. Also quite PROMO, but not to the level of nuking it. Just not notable. John from Idegon (talk) 18:16, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. clpo13_(talk) 07:01, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. clpo13_(talk) 07:01, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. clpo13_(talk) 07:01, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. clpo13_(talk) 07:01, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Comment - with all the additions since the nomination, perhaps it has reached the level where TNT would be appropriate per PROMO. John from Idegon (talk) 00:23, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
Delete although she did get cited a little after publicatino of Poverty Sucks, it was just a few mentions [https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Aimee+Elizabeth%22++%22poverty+sucks%22&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8#q=%22Aimee+Elizabeth%22++%22poverty+sucks%22&tbm=nws], not reviews of the book'; no alone profiles/interviews that enable sourcing of a bio with RS.E.M.Gregory (talk) 01:16, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
Non-Delete - all the additions since the nomination were done in an effort to correct the issues described that led to nomination. More references from varied sources to show notability. Internal and external lists as requested. Photo as requested. Content neutral. Prefer further correction instead of deletion. Suggestions?112233445566 (talk) 00:27, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti ^Talk 16:33, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Delete as not yet better convincing. SwisterTwister talk 19:29, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Non-Delete Subject is well-known nationally and accomplished. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.227.30.229 (talk) 17:55, 30 January 2016 (UTC) — 68.227.30.229 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
Non-Delete Aimee Elizabeth is an internationally known reality tv personality and best selling author.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.199.133.14 (talk • contribs) — 146.199.133.14 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
Comment Subject is an expert in her field and has been quoted in highly regarded publications such as Fox Business, US News & World Report, Bankrate.com, Business Insider. Interviews on major television networks, radio and various other publications. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 112233445566 (talk • contribs) You only get to vote once. John from Idegon (talk) 23:10, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.