Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Air Charter Bahamas

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗plicit 23:56, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

=[[:Air Charter Bahamas]]=

:{{la|1=Air Charter Bahamas}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Air Charter Bahamas}})

After a thorough search, I could only find one source for Air Charter Bahamas, and that is the airline's website itself. It does not have an IATA code, and airlinecodes.co.uk could not find an ICAO code. For all I can find, the airline may not even exist.

Given that information, if it even exists, it does not seem that the airline meets Wikipedia's notability criteria, so it should be deleted Alec static 23:48, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Transportation, and Bahamas. Alec static 23:48, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Travel and tourism and Aviation. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:53, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

:*Delete per nom. Looks like a small charter service

:AnonymousScholar49 (talk) 13:21, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

:*Delete per WP:INDISCRIMINATE. The only independent websites I can find that mention this charter are directories of travel agencies and pilots. They don’t say much about the service, and I can’t find any non-directory source covering this. ApexParagon (talk) 22:48, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

:*Delete does lack RS citation s to support its keepability here.Villkomoses (talk) 13:45, 29 April 2025 (UTC)

:*Delete I was unable to find any RSes to support keeping it. We cannot allow every single company ever to have existed to have their own page, they require notability and independent sources. This does not seem to be a major company worthy of inclusion. Gjb0zWxOb (talk) 15:34, 29 April 2025 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.