Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aircraft carrier style

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Gangnam Style#Other parodies and covers. (non-admin closure) TBrandley ^{(what's up)} 02:44, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

=[[Aircraft carrier style]]=

:{{la|Aircraft carrier style}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Aircraft_carrier_style Stats])

:({{Find sources|Aircraft carrier style}})

WP:NOT plus a smattering of anything else you can think of Petebutt (talk) 10:08, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

Delete this WP:NOT encyclopedic piece of quickly-forgettable trivia that seems to have flashed briefly across the media. Chiswick Chap (talk) 10:17, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
Redirect and Merge to Gangnam Style#Other parodies and covers. Not that there's much that needs merging, but WP:CHEAP is valid for a redirect that some people may well use. Lukeno94 (talk) 14:31, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
Keep as creater of the article. Passes WP:Notability and WP:IINFO. 069952497a (talk) 15:31, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
Merge to Gangnam Style#Other parodies and covers per WP:NOPAGE. The casual coverage from major news sources might merit notability (assuming it doesn't fall under WP:NOTNEWS), but the Gangnam Style article provides better context to place this content. Diego (talk) 16:39, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
Merge it's fairly well-reported as parodies go, but no evidence of lasting importance, long-running coverage, substantial critical comment, or anything to indicate it's more than a little joke. --Colapeninsula (talk) 10:32, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
Merge to Gangnam Style#Other parodies and covers - This stuff comes and goes, and I haven't heard anything lately about it. However, it is pretty well-reported, and it could merit notability, but Gangnam Style appears to have better context for this stuff. Zappa O Mati 03:46, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:41, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:41, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.