Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ajoy Ghose
=[[Ajoy Ghose]]=
:{{la|Ajoy Ghose}} – (
:({{Find sources|Ajoy Ghose}})
Fails WP:N. Main claim to notability is past president of Indian Institution of Engineers. Citation to support his position as "Director of the Central Mine Planning and Design Institute of India" has no mention of him. Article has been tagged for multiple issues, including inadequate sourcing and lack of notability, for three months. PROD tag removed with little improvement one month ago. Cresix (talk) 01:55, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. —Cresix (talk) 01:55, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
- Keep per WP:PROF criteria 6 (president of Institution of Engineers) and 3 (fellow of Indian National Academy of Engineering). Phil Bridger (talk) 12:03, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
- Comment - His status as fellow of Indian National Academy of Engineering is not confirmed by the source cited in the article. Cresix (talk) 18:03, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
- [http://www.inae.org/fellows_section_6-10.htm#SECTION-VIII Yes it is], and [http://www.inae.org/jaikrishna.htm this source], which is also in the article, confirms that he received an award for which only fellows are eligible, and would qualify for WP:PROF criterion 2 as a prestigious national award. Phil Bridger (talk) 19:05, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
- I'm not necessarily saying the information is inaccurate. And please correct me if I'm wrong, but it appears to me that the source used in the section stating "He is a Fellow of the Indian National Academy of Engineering" cites [http://www.cmpdi.co.in cmpdi.co.in], which says nothing about Ghose. That's why I placed an fv tag on it. This may simply be a matter of adding the right source to the right place. If so, the problems will then be solved. Thanks for clarifying. Cresix (talk) 19:48, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —Phil Bridger (talk) 12:06, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
- Keep. Not much on GS but presidency and fellowships give a keep. Xxanthippe (talk) 03:15, 2 October 2010 (UTC).
:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:26, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
- Second relist rationale. The article is a BLP. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:26, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
- Keep per WP:PROF#C3 and possibly also C6. I added the NAE source found by Phil Bridger. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:45, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
- Keep, per Phil Bridger. Enough here to pass WP:PROF. Nsk92 (talk) 18:54, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.