Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Al-Farooq (book)
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ to Shibli Nomani. ✗plicit 01:37, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
=[[:Al-Farooq (book)]]=
:{{la|1=Al-Farooq (book)}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|title=Al-Farooq (book)}})
I removed some unverified and unsourced content from the page. It was already a stub, and now it's even shorter. Deletion seems to be the most appropriate option.–𝐎𝐰𝐚𝐢𝐬 𝐀𝐥 𝐐𝐚𝐫𝐧𝐢 ʕʘ̅͜ʘ̅ʔ 01:05, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Islam and India. –𝐎𝐰𝐚𝐢𝐬 𝐀𝐥 𝐐𝐚𝐫𝐧𝐢 ʕʘ̅͜ʘ̅ʔ 01:05, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 01:15, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
:There are some references on the Uzbek wiki (:uz:Al-faruq) that look promising, but I can only access [https://doi.org/10.21580/jish.32.2921 this one]. I've added some context. It could be notable; I lean towards keep. I realized that those sources are considered unreliable by the nominator who removed them recently. Would be useful to know why they are unreliable, but I trust your judgment since I can't read them. Reconrabbit 19:51, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
::{{ping|Reconrabbit}} I initially added the sources while working on the Bibliography of Shibli Nomani. Although they are reliable, they are not directly relevant to the text, which is why I chose to remove them. However, if you find them useful, you're welcome to incorporate them. There is no shortage of credible sources available online. The primary concern is that, in its current state, this article does not meet the standards required for a standalone entry.–𝐎𝐰𝐚𝐢𝐬 𝐀𝐥 𝐐𝐚𝐫𝐧𝐢 ʕʘ̅͜ʘ̅ʔ 20:19, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
:::The linked source from the Journal of Islamic Studies and Humanities dedicates about two pages to this book, which led me to believe it was worthwhile to use it. If it does not meet the standards for an article on a book, it could be redirected back to Shibli Nomani until someone compiles more substantial information. Reconrabbit 20:38, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
:
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 05:14, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
- Redirect as I don’t see enough here for a stand alone article. Mccapra (talk) 04:32, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
:
Relisting comment: Relisting. User:Mccapra, where are you suggesting this, and other articles, be Redirected to? Please always identify a target article.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 06:22, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
::I’m suggesting redirecting to Shibli Nomani, the author, where the work is mentioned. Mccapra (talk) 09:13, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
- Redirect to Shibli Nomani.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 10:42, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.