Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Al-Rehman School of Alpha Studies

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 11:14, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

=[[:Al-Rehman School of Alpha Studies]]=

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|Al-Rehman School of Alpha Studies}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Al-Rehman_School_of_Alpha_Studies Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Al-Rehman School of Alpha Studies}})

Fails WP:GNG, WP:NSCHOOL. Störm (talk) 07:05, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:46, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:46, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

  • Delete a non-notable high school.John Pack Lambert (talk) 22:08, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Delete: I found only sparse, possibly reliable evidence of this school's existence: [http://www.sheikhupura.pk/skp/safdarabad.htm sheikhupura.pk] and [https://www.pakistaneo.com/bise-lahore-board-schools-code-list-institute-result-2018/ palostaneo.com]. Disparate passing rates are reported on lists of schools' perfomance on standard exams, from 35/68 (51.5%) 9th grade passing rate in 2018, to 45/61 (73.7%) "Institute wise (?wide?) passing rate" in 2019: [http://sedinfo.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/Lahore-Board-9th-2018.pdf sedinfo.net] and [https://e.jang.com.pk/pdf-data/BOARD_OF_INTERMEDIATE_&_SECONDARY_EDUCATION_LAHORE_RESULTS_2019.pdf e.jang.com]. It is one of two blue-linked educational institutes in Safdarabad out of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Safdarabad#Education a long red-linked list]. Without easily accessible (i.e., online) sources, there is just an absence of reliable, independent secondary sources on most of Pakistan's schools, and it is difficult to judge the reliability of the sources that Google does turn up. This one fails GNG. — Grand'mere Eugene (talk) 01:42, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.