Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Al Duncan (motivational speaker)
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_preload&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Al Duncan (motivational speaker)}}&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Al Duncan (motivational speaker)}}&editintro=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_intro&preloadtitle={{urlencode:Al Duncan (motivational speaker)}}§ion=new&title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_undeletion&create=Request request the article's undeletion]. ✗plicit 03:12, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
=[[:Al Duncan (motivational speaker)]]=
:{{la|1=Al Duncan (motivational speaker)}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|title=Al Duncan (motivational speaker)}})
Subject lacks independent significant coverage in multiple reliable sources. The sources in the article are mainly press releases, or are about events in which Duncan was involved but not about Duncan directly. Those sources where Duncan is the main subject are too closely connected to him to be considered independent. Article reads like a CV or press release. I can't find independent coverage on the awards. The article is also an orphan with zero incoming wikilinks. 4meter4 (talk) 02:49, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 10:58, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 10:58, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Coverage about Duncan is not significant enough (mostly from very small local newspapers) to warrant him an article. pinktoebeans (talk) 15:49, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.