Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alaska Teen Media Institute

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 00:10, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

=[[Alaska Teen Media Institute]]=

:{{la|Alaska Teen Media Institute}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alaska Teen Media Institute}}|2=AfD statistics}})

:({{findsources|Alaska Teen Media Institute}})

fails WP:ORG. most of the gnews listing is events listings not in depth coverage. [http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22Alaska+Teen+Media+Institute%22&num=10&as_price=p0&scoring=a&hl=en&sa=N&start=0]. LibStar (talk) 05:56, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

  • Keep - Significant coverage in independent reliable sources [http://www.ktuu.com/Global/story.asp?S=10616056 here] and [http://www.alaskaice.org/material.php?matID=96 here]. Some several hundred cites of them as a news source/news organisation rebroadcasting on a range of TV and radio stations both in Alaska and elsewhere. Also note that since they are a news source that apparently exercises editorial control, and that their journalists have [http://www.alaskapressclub.org/index.php/awards/2004awards won notable awards], this is a case where having an article on them enriches Wikipedia in ways other than directly through content (by allowing a collection point for discussion about their reliability as a source). - DustFormsWords (talk) 06:47, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- - 2/0 (cont.) 07:36, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
  • On the fence for now. The links provided by Dust for Worms are pretty trivial coverage, and I'm not sure that the Alaska ICE site could be considered a reliable source anyway. My own search found a lot of content produced by ATMI, but not much about the organization. Perhaps if we keep digging some better, more substantial sources could be found. Beeblebrox (talk) 08:58, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Wine Guy~Talk 10:37, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CTJF83 chat 09:50, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

  • Delete per WP:ORG. Distinct lack of any notable activities or substantial coverage by reliable sources. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 16:06, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
  • Delete. Largely promotional article that fails WP:ORG. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 17:43, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.