Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alcione Sortica

:{{la|Alcione Sortica}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Alcione_Sortica Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Alcione Sortica}})

Nonnotable poet. The article was created by user:Sortica, what a coincidence :-) who abandoned it since 2011. No serious independent sources. His bio was deleted from his native-language pt:WP last month. Staszek Lem (talk)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! ^{Babymissfortune} 01:31, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! ^{Babymissfortune} 01:31, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! ^{Babymissfortune} 01:31, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! ^{Babymissfortune} 01:31, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

• Delete no indepth coverage to show notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:20, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
• Delete. Poetry is not an easy subject to gain notability in. His article lists a lot of books, but I can't even find convincing evidence that they exist, let alone that they are published rather than self-published, let alone that they have enough reviews for WP:AUTHOR. And our article is no help; its references are entirely to Sortica's own web site. —David Eppstein (talk) 07:09, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.