Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alden Darby

:{{la|Alden Darby}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Alden_Darby Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Alden Darby}})

Contested prod. Aspiring NFL player who has hung around on practice squads for a few years but has never appeared in a regular season game, thereby failing WP:NGRIDIRON. Has received some local coverage, but in my view not enough to meet WP:GNG. --Finngall ^talk 21:51, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 21:57, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:34, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:34, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

• Keep Passes GNG [http://archive.azcentral.com/sports/asu/articles/20130828asu-footballs-alden-darby-destined-inspire.html] [http://pit.247sports.com/Bolt/Getting-to-know-reservefuture-players-Alden-Darby-36703659] [http://www.timesonline.com/sports/steelers/steelers-alden-darby-cameron-stingily-hope-extra-reps-pay-off/article_1c969d94-3a31-11e5-8843-e3fa954c74ff.html] [https://lbpost.com/sports/7088-the-resiliency-of-millikan-s-qb-rb-db-alden-darby] [http://www.theadvocate.com/new_orleans/sports/saints/article_3737992b-851c-5a78-90d5-7eb8bae5d8ec.html] [http://www.post-gazette.com/sports/steelers/2015/05/18/Safety-Alden-Darby-not-just-a-run-of-the-mill-Steelers-free-agent-signing/stories/201505180016] [http://www.espn.com/blog/new-orleans-saints/post/_/id/22321/saints-alden-darby-refused-payment-for-returning-no-41-to-roman-harper]. WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 23:49, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
• Delete only has played on practice squads. The coverage is all just routine.John Pack Lambert (talk) 08:39, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
• Keep coverage is WP:NOTROUTINE and far beyond basic transaction listings (although there are a lot of those). There are also feature articles and references in multiple sources over many years including his college career that all together pass WP:GNG. Be sure to look past the first page of a google search when researching.--Paul McDonald (talk) 13:29, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
• Keep per WikiOriginal-9 and Paulmcdonald. Passes WP:GNG with significant coverage (i.e., coverage that goes beyond routine) in multiple, reliable, and independent sources. Cbl62 (talk) 16:40, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
• Keep His coverage is not routine, there are enough sources to pass GNG. ~EDDY ^{(talk/contribs)}~ 10:46, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

:The above deletion debate is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.