Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aleena Saeed

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:SNOW MBisanz talk 00:35, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

=[[Aleena Saeed]]=

:{{la|Aleena Saeed}} ([{{fullurl:Aleena Saeed|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aleena Saeed}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Probable hoax - she's 16 and has written a song for Lil Wayne? The Melodifestivalen 2007 article states that fifth place went to a song by Marie Lindberg, not one by Saeed and Chris Brown. Google search for {{Google|"Aleena Saeed"}} is not fruitful (33 unique results). ... discospinster talk 18:24, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

:Comment: The article says that Aleena Saeed finished fifth in the first semifinal -- and the article on the semifinal results says that Andreas Lundstedt took fifth in that semifinal bracket. --A More Perfect Onion (talk) 18:30, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

::So it does. Thanks for noticing that. Point still stands though! ... discospinster talk 19:24, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

  • Delete - I have searched about and can find no confirmation. Likely hoax, certainly not notable. Article seems somewhat out of date - it says her song "will be performed in 2008 Kids' Choice Awards", which were nearly a year ago (and the article doesn't mention her). JohnCD (talk) 20:30, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete as hoax. Edward321 (talk) 00:36, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Speedy - g3, blatant misinformation. Hahaha. I am from Sweden, and Melodifestivalen is our competition to select the one who goes to ESC. IF she is born 1992, she was just 15 in 2007 and not allowed to compete:) The Rolling Camel (talk) 21:06, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete per WP:SNOW, I don't see any way this article will survive AfD at this point. Severe lack of verifiability (thanks Rolling Camel!) and notability. --A More Perfect Onion (talk) 23:30, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.