Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alessio Corti

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep (nomination withdrawn). The nominator withdrew their nomination, and no !votes to delete were posted (other than the nomination). (Non-administrator closure.) Northamerica1000(talk) 16:30, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

=[[Alessio Corti]]=

:{{la|Alessio Corti}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Alessio_Corti Stats])

:({{Find sources|Alessio Corti}})

Article was deproded without addressing the concern. The only claim for notability is the Whitehead Prize. Yet there is no evidence that the Whitehead prize is a notable award, and that is the only claim to notability in the article. It appears that multiple people receive the Whitehead prize, which is one of multiple prizes given by one of multiple mathematical societies in the U.K. While this may be notable, I can't locate any independent reliable source coverage to establish such notability. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 04:49, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:17, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:18, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

  • Weak keep. I don't think the award by itself is quite enough. But he also seems to have a personal chair at Imperial [http://www2.imperial.ac.uk/~acorti/vita.html] and enough citations in a low-citation area to convince me of a pass of WP:PROF#C1. —David Eppstein (talk) 16:21, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
  • Keep as per Eppstein. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:49, 21 May 2012 (UTC).
  • Nomination withdrawn - With the discovery of the named chair, even though I am unable to find any coverage of that chair, he appears to pass WP:ACADEMIC. Thank you for turning up that obscure fact, David. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 00:05, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.