Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexanderstone Meadows

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. qedk (t 桜 c) 08:34, 1 March 2020 (UTC)

=[[:Alexanderstone Meadows]]=

:{{la|Alexanderstone Meadows}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Alexanderstone_Meadows Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Alexanderstone Meadows}})

This article needs to be deleted because a one sentence article with no references and no notability. I have also tried finding anything about Alexanderstone Meadows, but nothing showed up, which means there is no significant coverage. I am also nominating Boxbush Meadows for deletion. Analog Horror, (Speak) 01:37, 29 February 2020 (UTC)

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2020 February 22. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 07:04, 22 February 2020 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Wales-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:11, 22 February 2020 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:15, 25 February 2020 (UTC)

Delete After some searching I did at least find [https://naturalresources.wales/media/659470/SSSI_1105_Citation_EN001ddcd.pdf Natural Resources Wales site citation for the place] and related documents but that's only of limited help. There is no evidence of any public, journalistic, or academic interest that would demonstrate notability under any applicable guideline. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 20:08, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
Delete That was also the only source I found, no further coverage. The UK has [https://www.woodlandtrust.org.uk/blog/2019/03/sssi-definition/ more than 6,000 SSSIs]. I'm not aware of a consensus that they are automatically notable. Other unsourced one-liners in this batch of mass-produced "articles" include Boxbush Meadows, Caeau Blaen-bydernyn, and Rhos Garth-fawr. Reywas92^Talk 20:43, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
Delete per WP:GNG and WP:RS. --BonkHindrance (talk) 16:35, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
Delete per everyone above.4meter4 (talk) 02:06, 1 March 2020 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.