Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexandra Lapierre
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Sandstein 23:19, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
=[[:Alexandra Lapierre]]=
:{{la|Alexandra Lapierre}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|title=Alexandra Lapierre}})
No sources cited. Fails WP:GNG Jenyire2 20:08, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Jenyire2 20:08, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 20:47, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 20:47, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep per WP:HEY, WP:GNG and WP:AUTHOR due to the rapid improvements and additions of reviews and in-depth coverage from independent and reliable sources to this article, including [https://www.kirkusreviews.com/book-reviews/alexandra-lapierre/the-woman-of-a-thousand-names/ Kirkus Reviews], the [https://www.sfgate.com/books/article/Robert-Louis-Stevenson-s-Wife-Sacrificed-Her-Art-3034488.php San Francisco Chronicle], [https://www.nytimes.com/1995/06/01/books/5-years-of-living-another-woman-s-life.html The New York Times], [https://archive.nytimes.com/www.nytimes.com/books/00/10/15/bib/001015.rv080927.html 2], [https://www.nytimes.com/1995/05/14/books/in-short-nonfiction.html 3], and the [https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/entertainment/books/1995/07/23/the-woman-with-the-burning-eyes/773c5567-02a9-495f-a65e-80a2e9fa0971/ Washington Post] Beccaynr (talk) 21:37, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep Yes the creator had asked for a little time as they were not able to move the title of the article (I had earlier CSD'd this - see my talk page) the article has been improved and passes NAUTHOR in my opinion JW 1961 Talk 21:44, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
- Keep - article has been vastly improved and notability is clearly demonstrated Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 22:07, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
- Keep - She is notable, her works have drawn significant critical attention: [https://dra.american.edu/islandora/object/auislandora%3A77537/datastream/PDF/view review published in Art in America], [https://www.theguardian.com/books/2001/apr/14/saulbellow The Guardian], [https://www.nytimes.com/2014/08/03/travel/zeroing-in-on-the-female-traveler.html The New York Times], [https://www.elle.fr/Loisirs/Livres/Genre/Biographie/Je-te-vois-reine-des-quatre-parties-du-monde Elle magazine], [https://www.lepoint.fr/culture/l-excessive-le-portrait-d-une-duchesse-vagabonde-17-06-2010-1204542_3.php#xtmc=alexandra-lapierre&xtnp=1&xtcr=2 Le Point, a French magazine], [https://www.lemonde.fr/livres/article/2008/11/20/tout-l-honneur-des-hommes-d-alexandra-lapierre_1120815_3260.html#y7crFtb6zKOG6rdM.99 review in another French newspaper, Le Monde], [https://www.lesechos.fr/2016/04/la-baronne-et-ses-mysteres-1110778 published in French financial newspaper, Les Echos], [https://www.jstor.org/stable/2933933?seq=1 article published in Vol. 50 of Nineteenth-Century Literature, discusses her work], [https://www.jstor.org/stable/1358966?seq=1 another article published in Vol. 23 of Women's Art Journal, talks about her work], and there are several other sources. --Ashleyyoursmile! 07:53, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
- Keep as above, Mary Mark Ockerbloom (talk) 16:09, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
- Keep per WP:HEY. Bearian (talk) 16:01, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.