Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alibaba Aradajanu Dongalu

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Article still desperatly needs expansion, though. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 18:45, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

=[[Alibaba Aradajanu Dongalu]]=

:{{la|Alibaba Aradajanu Dongalu}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Alibaba_Aradajanu_Dongalu Stats])

:({{Find sources|Alibaba Aradajanu Dongalu}})

No references to show significance or notability of subject. Must be significantly rewritten to encyclopedic. Tow Trucker talk 00:04, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

Delete - Might barely meet notability requirements, but agree that a significant rewrite is needed. In its current state the article has no value. NickCT (talk) 14:53, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Gongshow ^Talk 23:58, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Gongshow ^Talk 23:58, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

Comment: NOW It's encyclopdic.[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Alibaba_Aradajanu_Dongalu&action=history] Format is quite often an adressable issue. It does need expansion and sourcing, but perhaps now someone will bother.Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 05:41, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
Keep. A hit comedy film in a regional language of India. Systemic bias is a reason for inadequate coverage by English media of pre-internet era Indian regional films that were not internationally or even nationally acclaimed.--Dwaipayan (talk) 03:02, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
Keep per Dwaipayan. —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 04:35, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:58, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger _{One ping only} 02:13, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.