Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alien Encounters
=[[Alien Encounters]]=
:{{la|Alien Encounters}} ([{{fullurl:Alien Encounters|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alien Encounters}}&action=delete}} delete]) –
No evidence of coverage in reliable sources that might establish notability. Oo7565 (talk) 20:44, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 20:47, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. —Emperor (talk) 22:02, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
- Keep It has 11 people that worked on it, which have their own articles on wikipedia, they quite notable in their industry. Plus an editor who also was apparently notable. When that many influential people work on something, it certainly worth mentioning. Dream Focus 22:26, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
- Keep per improved article now sourced. And yes, as the work of notables (now sourced). Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 01:51, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
- Keep, please search for sources per WP:BEFORE before coming to AfD. Hobit (talk) 17:07, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
- Keep Now sourced. — BQZip01 — talk 17:16, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. I've already issued a final warning to the nominator, who despite repeated warnings is continuing apparently going through Special:Allpages tagging articles for deletion for spurious reasons. – iridescent 19:57, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
- Keep — Notable comic book. (Ibaranoff24 (talk) 21:53, 19 April 2009 (UTC))
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.