Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aline Nakashima

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|Aline Nakashima}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Aline_Nakashima Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Aline Nakashima}})

The usual suspects, yet another article only referencing two directories. It’s all well and good that she appeared in SI Swimsuit two times, but no reliable sources are even out there to give notability. Seriously. Trillfendi (talk) 01:41, 3 May 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. IntoThinAir (talk) 01:55, 3 May 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Kpgjhpjm 02:25, 3 May 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. Kpgjhpjm 02:25, 3 May 2019 (UTC)

• Comment. What is wrong with Models.com and FashionModelDirectory.com as reliable sources? If the profiles are staff-written and the site has reasonable editorial controls, then the two sites are reliable sources. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 02:59, 3 May 2019 (UTC)

:: Models.com can be reliable for things like their Top 50 lists that they update somewhat frequently. The problem is, with articles like this (with most articles actually), models.com is just thrown in the infobox as a reference for what modeling agencies they are signed to because the agencies themselves would be primary sources. That doesn’t really offer anything of value. But really, both websites only offer aggregations of content not always taken from a reliable source. Models.com rarely if ever properly attributes where they got images from or sometimes take directly from social media. Fashion Model Directory is called “the IMDb of fashion” for a reason. They also don’t update their website enough (a lot of models are missing years of work). So no, two directories by themselves are not reliable sources. Trillfendi (talk) 03:19, 3 May 2019 (UTC)

• Delete - does not meet WP:NMODEL - no significant coverage or contribution, she just has a job as a model - Epinoia (talk) 20:59, 8 May 2019 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.