Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AllBusiness.com

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Ron Ritzman (talk) 13:44, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

=[[AllBusiness.com]]=

:{{la|AllBusiness.com}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|AllBusiness.com}})

Delete. Non-notable company. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 01:46, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:44, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
Keep WTF? There are significant news stories already listed in the article, without even needing to search; see for example [http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9C05E0DB153FF931A35751C0A9669C8B63 this] New York Times article. Google News Archive finds pages and pages of hits; many are press releases, others are general-interest news stories under the company's byline, but some are significant reporting about the company. It's a wholly-owned subsidiary of Dun & Bradstreet so I suppose it could be merged to that page, but I believe it is independently notable. --MelanieN (talk) 01:34, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
Keep; looks to have substantial coverage in independent sources, so I think it meets our notability standards, although anything in this sector is going to look slightly spammy at first glance. bobrayner (talk) 08:39, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.